Sanity CMS Review 2026: Is It Still a CMS or Something More?
·
By Arjun Walia
What Is Sanity? (And Why They Stopped Calling It a CMS)
Sanity started as a headless CMS. You know the drill — separate the content from the presentation, deliver it via APIs, and let developers build whatever frontend they want. That part hasn't changed.
What changed is the vision. In May 2025, Sanity rebranded from a "headless CMS" to a "Content Operating System." That sounds like marketing speak, but after digging into their Spring Release 2025, I think there's some substance behind it.
They added a Dashboard, a Canvas for AI-assisted writing, a Media Library for asset management, an App SDK for building custom tools, serverless Functions, Agent Actions for AI-driven workflows, and Insights for performance tracking. That's a lot more than just storing and serving content.
The core idea is still the same: structured content, API-first delivery, developer-friendly tooling. But now Sanity wants to own the entire content workflow, not just the storage layer.
How Sanity Actually Works
Sanity's architecture has three main parts, and understanding these is key to deciding if it's right for you.
Content Lake is the backend where all your content lives. It's structured data, not HTML, which means you can reuse the same content across a website, a mobile app, a smartwatch, or whatever else comes next. Real-time updates are built in — make a change in the Studio and it's instantly available everywhere. No waiting for a rebuild.
Sanity Studio is the editing interface. It's open source, written in React, and fully customizable. You define your content model in JavaScript or TypeScript, which lives in version control alongside your code. That's a big deal — your content schema evolves with your project, not against it.
GROQ and APIs are how you get content out. GROQ is Sanity's custom query language. It looks similar to GraphQL but was designed specifically for structured content with deeply nested relationships. You can also use the auto-generated GraphQL API or plain REST if that's more your style. Real-time listeners let your app react to content changes instantly.
The Good: What I Actually Liked
Let me start with what impressed me.
Developer-first approach. This is not a platform designed for marketers who want to drag-and-drop a landing page. It's built for developers who want to define content models in code, version them, and ship fast. If you're comfortable with React and JavaScript, you'll feel right at home.
Structured content that's actually portable. Because everything is JSON and API-delivered, you can use the same content on a Next.js site, a React Native app, and a smart display without rewriting anything. This is the promise of headless CMS, but Sanity executes it well.
Real-time collaboration. Multiple editors can work on the same document simultaneously and see each other's changes. For distributed teams with tight deadlines, this is genuinely useful.
The new tools in Spring 2025. Canvas is a solid AI-assisted writing environment. The Media Library handles asset management better than most standalone DAM tools I've tested. And the App SDK lets you build custom interfaces for specific workflows — like a dashboard for approving translations or a tool for scheduling content releases.
Generous free tier. For solo developers or small projects, the free plan gives you 20 seats, 2 datasets, and enough bandwidth to get started. No time limit, no hidden gotchas.
The Bad: Where Sanity Falls Short
I'm not going to sugarcoat this. Sanity has real downsides.
GROQ is a learning curve. It's powerful, but it's not GraphQL or SQL. If your team already knows GraphQL, you'll have to learn a new syntax. The documentation is good, but it takes time to get comfortable.
Initial setup is complex. There's no templating system like WordPress themes or Webflow templates. You define everything from scratch — content models, Studio configuration, frontend integration. Non-developers will need help. Even experienced developers should budget a few days to get everything set up properly.
Maintenance responsibility. Because you customize so much, you're responsible for maintaining those customizations. Schema changes, Studio updates, plugin upgrades — it's all on you. If your team has limited frontend resources, this can become a burden.
Not for simple websites. If you just need a blog or a basic brochure site, Sanity is overkill. WordPress or Webflow will get you there faster with less effort.
Pricing can scale fast. The Growth plan is $15/seat/month, which is reasonable for small teams. But if you have 50 editors and need enterprise features, costs add up quickly.
Who Should Use Sanity (and Who Shouldn't)
Sanity is not for everyone. Here's who I think benefits most.
Developers who want full control over content architecture, frontend integration, and editorial workflows. If you like defining schemas in code and versioning them alongside your project, Sanity is a dream.
Content teams that need real-time collaboration, structured content, and AI-assisted drafting. Canvas and the Media Library are genuinely useful for editors who move fast.
Startups and growing teams that want a free tier to start with and the ability to scale without migrating platforms later.
Enterprise teams managing large content operations across multiple channels. Role-based access, dataset partitioning, and integrations with CDNs and analytics tools make it viable at scale.
Non-technical users can work with Sanity once the Studio is set up — but they'll need developer help to get there.
Who should skip it? If you're a solo blogger, a small business owner who just wants a website, or a team that doesn't have developer resources, look elsewhere. WordPress, Webflow, or even Framer will be faster to launch and easier to maintain.
Sanity Pricing: What You Actually Pay
Sanity uses usage-based pricing, which means you pay for what you use. Here's the breakdown:
Free plan: $0 forever. 20 users, 2 public datasets, real-time content, basic editing tools, and access to the Media Library. No AI Assist, no comments, no tasks. Good for personal projects and MVPs.
Growth plan: $15/seat/month. Up to 50 users, private datasets, content releases, AI Assist, comments, tasks, and optional pay-as-you-go overages. Add-ons like SSO are available. This is where most teams should start.
Enterprise plan: Custom pricing. SAML SSO, uptime SLAs, advanced access control, high usage quotas, onboarding, custom retention, and audit trails. For large organizations with compliance requirements.
The free tier is genuinely useful for testing and small projects. The Growth plan is reasonable for teams that need collaboration features. Enterprise pricing depends on your needs — you'll have to talk to sales.
Real-World Use Cases (Not Just Theory)
I looked at a few real examples to see how teams actually use Sanity.
Ecommerce. Siella Beauty uses Sanity alongside Shopify to manage campaign content, editorial, and landing pages separately from their product catalog. The content team controls storytelling while Shopify handles transactions. This is a common pattern — Sanity as the content layer, Shopify as the commerce layer.
Marketing websites. Lyngen North, an arctic luxury hotel, needed a high-performance website with frequent content updates. They combined Sanity with Next.js for a fast frontend and a custom Studio that lets the team update text, imagery, and packages without developer involvement.
Documentation and knowledge bases. Causal built their entire documentation system using Sanity and Next.js. Structured content in portable blocks, linked topics, code snippets, and multi-platform delivery. This is where Sanity's structured content approach really shines.
These aren't edge cases. They're representative of how most teams use Sanity — as a content layer that integrates with other tools, not as a standalone platform.
Sanity vs Alternatives: Where It Fits
Sanity competes with a few different categories of tools.
vs WordPress. WordPress is easier to set up, has a huge plugin ecosystem, and works for simple sites out of the box. But it's not headless by default, and the content is tied to HTML. Sanity is better for multi-platform publishing and developer control.
vs Webflow. Webflow is great for designers who want visual control over layout and styling. But it's less flexible for developers who want to define custom content models and integrate with other services. Sanity gives you more freedom at the cost of more setup work.
vs Contentful. Contentful is the closest competitor. It's also a headless CMS with structured content and APIs. Contentful has better out-of-the-box editorial interfaces and a more mature ecosystem. Sanity has real-time collaboration, open-source Studio, and GROQ. Contentful is more enterprise-ready; Sanity is more developer-friendly.
vs Strapi. Strapi is open source and self-hosted, which gives you full control. But you're responsible for hosting, maintenance, and scaling. Sanity is fully managed — you don't worry about infrastructure. Strapi is better for teams that want to own everything; Sanity is better for teams that want to focus on content.
Final Verdict: Should You Use Sanity in 2026?
I've spent enough time with Sanity to form a strong opinion.
If you're a developer building a content-driven application that needs to deliver content to multiple platforms, Sanity is one of the best options available. The developer experience is excellent, the structured content approach is future-proof, and the new tools in Spring 2025 make it more than just a CMS.
If you're a non-technical team or just need a simple website, Sanity is overkill. Use WordPress, Webflow, or Framer. You'll launch faster and spend less time on setup.
The biggest tradeoff is complexity. Sanity gives you immense flexibility, but that flexibility comes with responsibility. You need to define your content model, build your Studio, integrate your frontend, and maintain everything. If you have the team and the skills, it's worth it. If you don't, it's a distraction.
For developers building multi-platform content systems, Sanity is my recommendation in 2026. For everyone else, know what you're getting into.
